A salesperson who makes a sale does not change the desires of the customer. βββββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ β ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββ β ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ
The author tries to draw an analogy between convincing people to vote for a politician and how a salesperson convinces people to buy a products. A salesperson doesnβt change the personβs desires, but rather convinces the person that a product will satisfy the personβs existing desires. Since convincing people to vote for a politician is analogous, after finding out what policies a person supports, one should try to convince the person that a particular politician is most likely to get those policies enacted.
Weβre looking to complete the analogy. The missing piece is the idea that one tries to convince a person that a particular politician is most likely to get the personβs preferred policies enacted.
Which one of the following ββββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ
show that the βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ
disguise any difference βββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ
convince the voter ββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββ
demonstrate that the ββββββββββ ββ β ββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ
persuade the voter ββββ ββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββ