In October 1999, the Law Reform Commission of Western Australia (LRCWA) issued its report, "Review of the Civil and Criminal Justice System." Buried within its 400 pages are several important recommendations for introducing contingency fees for lawyers' services into the state of Western Australia. ███████████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██ █████████ █████ ████ ███████ █████████ ██████ ███████ █████
████████ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████████ █████████████ ███ █████ ███ ███████████ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ██ █ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███ ████████ ██████ ███ ████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ████ ████ ███
██████████████ █████ ████ ███████████████ ███████ ███████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████████ █████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████ ███ █████ ██████ █████████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ███ ████ ███ █████████ █████████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████ ███ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████ ███████ █████ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ █ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ █████
██ ████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ███ ████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████████ ██████████ █████████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ███████ █████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ ███████████ █████ ████████ █████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ███████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████████ ██ █████████████ ██████ ██ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ██ ████ ██ █████████ ██████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██ █ ██████ ███
The passage states which one ██ ███ ██████████
Contingency-fee agreements serve ███ ███████ ██ ████████████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ █ █████ ██████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███████
The author explicitly states
Contingency-fee agreements of ███ ████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ ████ ████ ████████
This is not stated in the passage. In P2, the author says that the uplift fee is “intended to prevent lawyers from gaining disproportionately from awards of damages.” But he never addresses how much lawyers deserve to get paid.
At least some ██ ███ ███████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ████████████ ████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██████████
This is not stated in the passage. The author never mentions whether the LRCWA’s recommendations are actually likely to be implemented. Instead, he focuses on critiquing the LRCWA’s uplift fee recommendation.
Allowing contingency-fee agreements ██ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ █████ ███ ██████ ████████ █████████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████
This is not stated in the passage. The author says
Usually contingency-fee agreements ███████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████
This is not stated in the passage. The uplift fee agreement involves the lawyer receiving her usual fee plus an additional agreed-upon percentage of that fee, not of the client’s damages. The author doesn’t say what contingency-fee agreements usually involve; he just says contingency fees tend to be higher than regular fees.