PT138.S2.Q26

PrepTest 138 - Section 2 - Question 26

Hide analysis

Sarah: When commercial fishing boats with permits to fish for certain species accidentally catch a type of fish for which they have no permit, the latter must be thrown back. ████ ██ █ ████ ████████ ████████ ███████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ ██████ █████████████

█████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ████ █████ ████ █████ ████████ ████ ██ █ ███ ████ ████████████

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

Amar implicitly concludes that Sarah’s recommendation to allow fishers to keep accidentally caught fish should not be implemented. He argues that making this legal would likely lead to more "accidents," implying that fishers would claim that certain fish were caught accidentally just so that they could keep the fish.

Describe Method of Reasoning

Amar responds to Sarah’s argument by pointing out that her suggestion would likely lead to a negative consequence: fishers claiming fish were caught accidentally in order to keep fish they caught illegally.

Show answer
26.

The technique Amar uses in ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ██

a

question whether Sarah's ██████████████ ███ ██ ███ ████ ████████

Amar never questions whether Sarah’s recommendation can practically be implemented. He simply argues that her recommendation would likely bring a negative consequence.

b

point out that █████ ████ █ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████

Amar himself uses the term "accidents" to suggest that fishers would falsely claim they caught certain fish by accident. However, Sarah uses "accident" to mean a true accident, and Amar doesn't argue that she uses the term in two different ways.

c

allude to a ██████ ████ ██████████ ███████████ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ██████████████

Amar doesn’t strengthen the case for Sarah’s recommendation, he argues against her recommendation.

d

contend that Sarah's ██████████████ ███ ██ █████████ ████████ ███████████

Amar argues that Sarah’s recommendation has an important negative consequence: fishers claiming fish were caught accidentally in order to keep fish they caught illegally.

e

maintain that Sarah █████████ █████████ ███████ ████ ████ ████████

Amar never mentions anything about past policies, he just argues that Sarah’s recommendation would have a negative consequence.

Confirm action

Are you sure?