Company president: Support Most of our best sales representatives came to the job with a degree in engineering but little or no sales experience. █████ ████ ██ ████ █████ ████████████████ ██ ██████ █████ ██████████ ███ ████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ██████████ ████ █████████ █████ ██████████ ███ ██ ███████████ ████████
The author concludes that, when hiring sales reps, we should favor applicants who have engineering degrees but little/no sales experience over applicants with lots of sales experiences but no engineering degrees. This is based on the fact that most of the company’s best sales representatives had an engineering degree but little/no sales experience when joining the company.
The author assumes that the explanation for why most of the best sales representatives have an engineering degree and little/no sales experience is that this background contributes to success. But this overlooks the possibility that there are other explanations. For example, what if most people hired for a position as a sales representative have the background described? Then we’d expect most of the best reps to have that background.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ ████ █████████ ███████ ███ ███████ ███████████ █████████
Some of the █████████ █████ ███████████████ █████████ █ ██████ ██ ███████████ █████ ███████ ███ ███ ████████
The argument is just about what kind of background we want at the time of hiring. Whether reps who started without an engineering degree later got a degree doesn’t alter the support provided by the fact that most of the best reps started without an engineering degree.
Most of the ██████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ███████████████ ████ ███ █ ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ ██ █████ ███████████
This provides an alternate explanation for the statistic about the best reps. Maybe the reason most of the best have that background is that most sales reps have that background. So, we’d expect most of the best to have that background even if it doesn’t contribute to success.
Weaken: Introduce or support an alternate explanation for a phenomenon.
Strengthen: Helps to eliminate an alternate explanation for a phenomenon.
Most of the █████████ ████ ███ █████████ █████ ███████████████ ████ ████ ████ █ ██████ ██ ████████████
The background of customers is irrelevant. The argument is based on the background of the best sales reps.
Most of the ██████ ███ █████ ███ █ █████ ██████████████ ████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ █ ██████ ██ ████████████
If anything, this strengthens the argument by eliminating the potential alternate explanation that most applicants for a sales rep position have an engineering degree and little/no sales experience.
Answers that, if they have any effect, do the opposite of what we want (weaken when we're trying to strengthen, or strengthen when we're trying to weaken).
Some of the ██████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ██ █████ ███████████████ ███ ███ ████ ████████████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ███ ████ █████████ ████████ █████ ███████████
The author already acknowledges that “most” of the best have a particular background. This doesn’t mean the author thinks all of the best have that background.
Answer is attractive because it seems to (but doesn't actually) contradict the premises or conclusion.