CEO: Conclusion We have been falsely criticized for not being an environmentally responsible corporation. βββββββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ ββ βββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ
The CEO concludes the corporation has been falsely criticized for not being environmentally responsible. She supports this with the following premises:
(1) Environmentally responsible corporations do all they can to pollute less.
(2) The corporationβs new production methods pollute less than the old ones.
(3) No methods exist that produce no pollution at all.
The CEO assumes that the corporation is doing all that it can to pollute less. But just because their new methods are better than their old ones, doesnβt necessarily mean that the corporation is doing all that it can. What if there are other methods that would allow it to pollute even less than it does now? In that case, the corporation isnβt doing all that it can and so it isnβt environmentally responsible.
The reasoning in the CEO's ββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββ
takes for granted ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ
It doesn't matter whether production methods that do not produce pollution can be developed in the future. Because there are currently no methods that do not produce pollution, the corporation might be doing all that it can now, even if better methods are developed later.
fails to take ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ
The CEOβs argument doesn't rely on causal reasoning. Instead, the CEO assumes that her corporation is doing all it can to reduce pollution.
generalizes too hastily ββββ βββ βββββββββββββββ ββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββββ ββ β βββββ ββ ββββββββββ
The CEO only addresses the specific criticism that her corporation is not environmentally responsible. She argues that this criticism is false, but never generalizes about any other criticisms.
takes for granted ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ
The CEO doesnβt assume that the corporation has succeeded in reducing the amount of pollution it produces, she explicitly states that it has. She says, βOur current production methods pollute significantly less than our old methods did.β So the corporation did succeed.
ignores the possibility ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββ
To be environmentally responsible, the corporation must be doing all that it can to pollute less. If there are production methods that would allow the corporation to produce less pollution than it does now, then it isnβt doing all it can and it isnβt environmentally responsible.