PT140.S2.Q10

PrepTest 140 - Section 2 - Question 10

Hide analysis

A recent study showed that Support people who address problems quickly and directly are significantly less likely to have gum disease than are people who react to problems by refusing to think about them. █████ ██████ ███ ████ █ ████████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ███ ███████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████

Summary

The author hypothesizes that suppression of the immune system contributes to gum disease. This hypothesis is based the fact that stress suppresses the immune system, and people who refuse to think about problems are more likely to have gum disease.

Notable Assumptions

The author attempts to draw a causal chain: stress leads to immune suppression, which in turn contributes to gum disease. But nothing in the premises suggest that people who get gum disease have experienced any kind of stress. Instead, all we’re told about gum disease is that that it’s associated with people who refuse to think about problems. So why should we think that stress is in any way related to gum disease? The author must assume that refusing to think about problems contributes to stress.

Show answer
10.

The argument requires the assumption ████

a

painful conditions will █████████ ████ █ ████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ ████████

This gets the direction of cause and effect backward. The argument is that how one responds to problems ultimately affects the occurrence of a specific condition (gum disease). (A) instead suggests that the occurence of a painful condition affects how one responds to problems. Because (A) supports a completely different explanation from the author’s own conclusion, this can’t be a necessary assumption.

1%
b

refusing to think █████ █████████ █████████ ███████████ ██ █ ████████ █████ ██ ██████

The author draws a causal connection from stress to immune suppression to gum disease. But the premises give no reason to think that people with gum disease have experienced stress. Instead, gum disease is associated with refusing to think about problems. The author must assume that refusing to think about problems causes stress, which triggers the causal chain leading to gum disease.

90%
c

people who have ██████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ ████████

This means that people with high stress levels—and therefore suppressed immune systems—are the kind of people who are less likely to have gum disease. This weakens the argument that immune suppression contributes to gum disease, so it can’t be a necessary assumption.

1%
d

people who tend ██ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ ████████

This suggests an alternative explanation for why these people are less likely to have gum disease: it’s not about stress levels or immune suppression, but rather that these people are proactive about seeking dental care. Since this is unrelated to the explanation the author argues for, it can’t be a necessary assumption.

2%
e

the reason some ██████ ██████ ██ █████ █████ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ██ █████████

This weakens the argument. People who refuse to think about problems are the ones more likely to get gum disease. If refusing to think about problems might help avoid stress, then we have less reason to point to stress (and the resulting immune suppression) as a contributor to gum disease.

6%

Confirm action

Are you sure?