Some theorists argue that literary critics should strive to be value-neutral in their literary criticism. βββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ
The author concludes that literary critics should NOT try (strive) to be value-neutral in their literary criticism. This is based on the fact that literary criticism cannot be completely value-neutral.
If you didnβt understand the conclusion in the way described above, then you probably didnβt translate what it means for the theorists to be βmistaken about what is an appropriate goal for literary criticism.β The first sentence said the theorists argue that striving to be value-neutral was an appropriate goal. If those theorists are mistaken, that means striving to be value-neutral is NOT an appropriate goal.
Does the fact that literary critics canβt be value-neutral prove that they shouldnβt TRY to be value-neutral? No. Why shouldnβt we strive for the impossible? To make the argument valid, we want to establish that if something canβt be done, then literary critics shouldnβt try to do it.
The argument's conclusion follows logically ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
Any critic who ββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββββ
If it is ββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββ ββ ββ ββββββββββββββ
Critics are more ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ
The less readers ββββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ β ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ
Critics who try ββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ