Subscription pricing
New evidence indicates that recent property development bordering a national park has not adversely affected the park's wildlife. ██ ███ █████████ █ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ████████ ████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ███████████ █████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ███████ █████████ ███ ██████ █████████ ███ ███████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███████████ ███████ ███████
Summarize Argument
The author concludes that recent property development next to a national park has not harmed the park’s wildlife. This is based on the fact that a comparison of a survey conducted right before the development began and a recent survey shows that the amount of wildlife has increased over the past decade. In addition, the park’s resources can support the current wildlife population without any strain.
Notable Assumptions
The author assumes that the amount of wildlife would not have increased more without the property development. The author also assumes that the amount of wildlife is a reliable indicator of whether the park’s wildlife has been harmed.
25.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ ████ ███████████ ███ █████████
a
While both surveys █████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ █████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ ████ ████████
b
The more recent ██████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██ ███ █████████
c
Migration of wildlife ████ ███ ████ ████ ███ ████████ ██████████ █████ ███ █████████ ██████ ███████████ ██ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ████ █████████ █ ██████ ████
d
The most recent ██████████ ███ █████████ ████████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ █████████████████ ███████ ████ ████ █████ ███████████
e
The more recent ██████ ███ ████ ████████ ████████ ███ ███████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ███████ ████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ █████ ██████ ███ █████