Passage A
Research concerning happiness and wealth reveals a paradox: at any one time richer people report higher levels of happiness than poorer people in the same society report, and yet over time advanced societies have not grown happier as they have grown richer. …
When our living standards increase, we love it initially but then we adjust and it makes little difference. For example, if we ask people with different incomes what income they consider sufficient, the "required income" correlates strongly with their actual income: a rise in actual income causes a roughly equivalent rise in required income. We can also look at reported happiness over time. Job satisfaction depends little on the absolute level of wages but rises if wages rapidly increase.
We do not have the same experience with other aspects of our lives. We do not foresee how we adjust to material possessions, so we overinvest in acquiring them, at the expense of leisure.
Now consider the
A. You earn $50,000 a year while everyone else earns $25,000;.
B. You earn $100,000 a year while others make $200,000.
The majority chose the first. They were happy to be poorer, provided their relative position improved.
And indeed, how people compare to their "reference group"—those most like them—is crucial for happiness. In East Germany, for example, living standards have soared since 1990, but the level of happiness has plummeted because people now compare themselves with West Germans, rather than with people in other Soviet bloc countries.
Passage B
Does the Solnick and Hemenway study mean that we care most about one-upmanship? Perhaps out of our primeval past comes the urge to demonstrate our superiority in order to help ensure mating prospects, keeping our genetic lines going. Still programmed like this, we get unexplainable pleasure from having a bigger house than our neighbors.
This theory may sound good and is commonly heard, but it is not the explanation best supported by the evidence. Rather, the data show that earning more makes people happier because relative prosperity makes them feel that they are successful, that they have created value.
If two people feel equally successful, they will be equally happy even if their incomes differ greatly. Of course, people who earn more generally view themselves as successful. But it is the success—not the money per se—that provides the happiness. We use material wealth to show not just that we are prosperous, but that we are prosperous because we create value.
What scholars often portray as an ignoble tendency—wanting to have more than others—is really evidence of a desire to create value. Wanting to create value benefits society. It is a bonus that it also brings happiness.
In arguing for their respective positions, the author of passage A and the author of passage B both do which one of the following?
explain a phenomenon by pointing to its biological origins
Author A simply describes people’s behavior without suggesting if, or how, our biological origins influence that behavior. This is enough to eliminate (A).
Also, author B rejects the idea that people’s desire to earn more than others is explained by our biological origins.
endorse a claim simply because it is widely believed
Author A doesn’t rely on the fact that a claim is widely believed as support for any part of her argument. This is enough to eliminate (C).
Also, author B doesn’t rely on this kind of reasoning for any part of his argument, either. In fact, he argues against a widely used hypothesis for why people want to be richer than their neighbors.
accept a claim for the sake of argument
This describes accepting a claim even though the author doesn’t necessarily agree with that claim. Author A doesn’t do this. This is enough to eliminate (C).
Also, author B doesn’t do this, either. He briefly considers a possible hypothesis in P9, but he doesn’t accept it for the sake of argument; he rejects it, and spends the rest of the passage supporting an alternative hypothesis.
attempt to resolve an apparent paradox
Author A attempts to resolve an apparent paradox. But author B doesn’t suggest the existence of any paradox. He just argues in favor of a certain explanation for why people want to make more money than their neighbors.
assert that their positions are supported by data
Author A uses data from the Solnick and Hemenway study to support her position that the reason societies don’t grow happier as they grow wealthier is, in part, because what really makes people happy is being richer than their neighbors.
Author B uses data from the same study to support his position that the reason people want to earn more than their neighbors is actually that they want to know they’re creating value.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnostic