Given the amount of time and effort that curators, collectors, dealers, scholars, and critics spend on formulating judgments of taste in relation to oil paintings, it seems odd that so few are prepared to apply some of the same skills in exploring works of art that stimulate another sense altogether: that of smell. ███ ██ █████ ███████ ███ █████ ████ ██████████ █████ ███ █████████████ ███ ████ ███████ █████ ████ ████████ ██ ███████████ █████████████ ███ ██████ █ ████ ███ ██ ████ █ ██████████ █████████ ███ █████████ █████ █ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ █████ █████████
Author's position ·Perfume should be considered as art
Possibly the main point; this sounds like a conclusion that the author will the spend the rest of the passage supporting
Built up in layers, with end product changing over time. The author began this paragraph with a discussion of analogy, so expect the next paragraph to show how the process of perfume-making is analogous to this.
Author's perspective ·Disapproves of commercialization of perfume
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
1.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Main point
The author makes two central points. First, perfume should be considered an art and should be taken more seriously (P2 and P3). Second, one reason great perfume is undervalued might be that perfumes today are made by corporations (P4). The ideal main point answer would probably combine both points.
This is too narrow. The potential reaction that a great perfume gets compared to a great painting is merely be one reason why perfume should be considered an artform. But (B) wouldn’t capture the broader point of the author.
This is too strong to be supported. The author says only that “one” reason perfumes might be undervalued is “perhaps” the corporate nature of perfume-making.
d
Great perfumes are █████ ██ ███ ███ ███████ ███████ ███ █████████ ██ █████
This is the best answer. This is the implicit point of the first three paragraphs. The author presents parallels between perfume and other things recognized to be art to convey the point that perfume-making should be considered an art. In addition, the presents a rhetorical question in P1; the point of the question is to assert that great perfume should be taken more seriously.
This is too narrow. The author agrees with (E), but uses it as a supporting claim for the broader point that perfume-making should be taken more seriously as an art form. The main point isn’t about a comparison between perfume-making and oil painting. The author uses this comparison to make a point about perfume-making.
Difficulty
63% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is significantly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%136
154
75%173
Analysis
Main point
Art
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
0%
158
b
5%
159
c
6%
160
d
63%
165
e
26%
162
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.