"Stealing thunder" is a courtroom strategy that consists in a lawyer's revealing negative information about a client before that information is revealed or elicited by an opposing lawyer. █████ █████ ██ ██ █████ ██ █████████ █ ████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ████ █████ ███ ██ █████████ ██ █████ ████ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ████████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██████████ █████ ██ ████ █████████
████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██████ ███ █████████████ ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ███████ ███████ █████████ █████████ █████ ██████████ ████ █████████ ████
████████ ████████ ███████ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ███ █████ ███ ████████ ███ █████████████ ████ ██ ███████████ █████████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ████████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ████ ████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ███ ██ ██████ ███████████ ███████ ███ █████ █████████ ████ ██████ ███████████ █████ █ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ██ ████████ █████ ████████ █████████ ███ █████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ████████ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████████ ███
The author discusses the "
indicate that at █████ ████ ███████████ █████████ █████ ██ █ █████ ███ █████████ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ███████████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████
This best captures the purpose as explained above.
indicate that jurors █████ ████ █████ ████ ████ ███████ █████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ██████ █████ ████████ ██████ ██████
The author doesn’t indicate that jurors bring attitudes and biases into court. We know that they usually want to solidify their position regarding a case, but this doesn’t imply that they come into the case with any attitudes or biases. Also, the “cognitive framework” doesn’t relate to attitudes/biases jurors bring in from outside court.
suggest that damaging ████████ ████ ██ ██████ ██████████ █████ ██ █ █████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ██████ ████ ████████ ████████ █████████ █████ ██ █ █████
The author never suggests damaging evidence framed positively earlier will have more impact than damaging evidence presented later.
theorize that stealing ███████ ██ ████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ██ █ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ██ ███████████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████████
The author never suggests that stealing thunder is best done as early as possible. Although it makes sense to think that this is a reasonable approach, the author never makes this point. So it can’t be the purpose of mentioning the “cognitive framework.”
speculate that creating ███████████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ████ █████████ ████ ██████████ ███████ ████ ███████ ███████████
The author never suggests that creating credibility is more effective than positive framing of negative information in some cases.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.