Implication ·Criminal law should focus on deterrence, not retribution
If people can't freely choose their actions, punishing them for choosing immoral acts doesn't make sense. Punishing should be about preventing future harm.
Elaborate on other perspective ·Difference between free actions and constrained actions.
Free actions are caused by things internal to a human (like will). These actions involved a choice between A or B. Constrained actions, including mental disorders, involve external forces that preclude someone from a choice. The person could only choose A.
Author's extension ·Actions resulting from regular brains are free
Even if those actions results from wills that are "determined" by the brain, they're still free.
Passage Style
18.
Which one of the following ████████ █████ █ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ █ ███ ███ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ██
Question Type
Stated
The correct answer will not play a role in Passage A, but it will play a role in Passage B.
a
mental disorder
Mental disorder isn’t mentioned anywhere in Passage A. But it is mentioned in Passage B
76%
b
free choice
Mentioned in Passage A.
7%
c
causality
Mentioned in Passage A.
13%
d
self-delusion
Mentioned in Passage A.
2%
e
moral responsibility
Passage B doesn’t mention moral responsibility. Although it discusses what kinds of actions are free, this is a separate issue from whether one bears moral responsibility for actions.
2%
Difficulty
76% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%136
149
75%162
Analysis
Stated
Stated
Stems asking us to identify an idea that appears explicitly in the passage (as opposed to ideas that are merely implied).