Self-study
Television host: While it's true that the defendant presented a strong alibi and considerable exculpatory evidence and was quickly acquitted by the jury, I still believe that Conclusion there must be good reason to think that the defendant is not completely innocent in the case. ██████████ ███ ██████████ █████ ███ ████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██████
Summarize Argument
The author concludes that there must be good reason to think the defendant is not completely innocent. This is based on the author’s belief that the prosecutor would not have brought charges if the defendant were completely innocent.
Identify and Describe Flaw
The author assumes that the charging decision of the prosecutor constitutes evidence that the defendant isn’t completely innocent. This overlooks the possibility that the charging decision might indicate nothing about the defendant’s guilt. For example, perhaps the charging decision is based on mistaken or fraudulent evidence. Or maybe the decision is corrupt and merely used to threaten and harass the defendant. We simply have no idea whether the charging decision is indicative of guilt.
10.
The reasoning in the television ██████ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ ███ ████████
a
takes lack of ████████ ███ █ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ██ █████
The author’s premise is that the prosecutor brought charges. It’s not asserting a lack of evidence for the view that the defendant is innocent.
b
presupposes as evidence ███ ██████████ ████ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████████
(B) describes circular reasoning. The author’s conclusion isn’t presupposed as evidence. The conclusion is that the defendant is not completely innocent. The evidence is the fact that the prosecutor brought charges. These aren’t the same idea.
c
places undue reliance ██ ███ █████████ ██ ██ █████████ ██████
The author places undue reliance on the charging decision of the prosecutor. There’s no compelling reason to believe that the defendant is guilty simply because of the prosecutor’s judgment that the defendant is guilty. We have to evaluate the evidence.
d
confuses legal standards ███ █████ ████ █████ █████████ ███ █████
It’s not clear whether the author means innocent in a legal sense or a moral sense, but regardless, it doesn’t matter, because the author never shifts between the two ideas. The flaw isn’t based on the difference between legal/moral standards.
e
concludes that a ████████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████
The author doesn’t argue that the jury’s decision is suspicious because it was reached quickly.