Wanda: It is common sense that one cannot create visual art without visual stimuli in one's work area, just as a writer needs written stimuli. █ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ██ ███████
███████ ███ █ ██████ █████ ██ ████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████████ █████████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████
Vernon's response indicates an implied conclusion that the items in Wanda’s studio are not effective stimuli for her artistic work. Vernon supports this conclusion with an analogy to writers: that they should read high-quality works, not tabloids. Vernon also implies that at least some of the items in Wanda's studio are junk, which is analogous to the tabloids in Vernon's analogy.
The question stem mentions an "underlying principle," which we can take to mean a principle that Vernon assumes as part of his argument. For the principle we're looking for to make sense as an unstated premise, it should form a premise-to-conclusion bridge and so better justify the argument.
So what's the gap that we're bridging? By relying on an analogy between Wanda, a visual artist, and writers, Vernon assumes that visual artists and writers are relevantly similar. In this specific context, the relevant similarity assumed is that the quality of the items they use for inspiration is important to their artistic process. Because this is the unstated part of Vernon's argument, the correct answer will affirm this similarity. The wording might vary, but in some form it will tell us that the inspiration visual artists can draw from visual stimuli is affected by the quality of those stimuli.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ █████████ ██████████ ████████ ████████ ██ ██████
It is unhealthy ██ ████ ██ █ █████████ ████ █████
Vernon never says anything about health, so this principle is beyond the scope of his argument—it leads to a conclusion about a different topic. Vernon is also less focused on how many items are in the space, and more on their quality, so "cluttered" isn't quite the right issue either.
The quality of ███ ███████ ██ ██ ████████ ███████████ ████████
This is the similarity required by Vernon's analogy to writers. Vernon's argument is supported by the importance of the quality of writers' inspirational material. That assumes that the quality of Wanda's inspiration also matters. By affirming that assumption, this bridges to Vernon's conclusion, that the junk in Wanda's studio isn't actually too inspiring.
Supermarket tabloids should ███ ██ ██████████ ████████████
Vernon mentions tabloids as an example of poor stimuli, but that doesn't mean that they're not stimulating at all. This also doesn't support the analogy Vernon draws between writers and visual artists, so can't effectively bridge to Vernon's conclusion.
Messiness impairs artistic ███████████
Vernon’s point is specifically about whether items like laundry and garbage are good creative stimuli, not what effect general messiness has on creativity. Like (A), this is too broad to match Vernon's argument. What we're looking for is something more specific about the importance of quality of stimuli for visual artists.
One should be ████ ██ ██ ████████ ████ ██ █ ██████ █████ ████ █████
Vernon doesn’t deny that stimuli are important; he just distinguishes between high and low quality stimuli. Vernon isn't telling Wanda to clear out her studio altogether, and that's the conclusion this principle would lead us to. Instead, we need something more focused on what quality of items Wanda is using as stimuli.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.