This is irrelevant and does not support the inclusion of the antidilution provision, as this claim only refers to side effects of incineration. We still have no more information about the effects of diluted waste products.

This supports the antidilution clause by showing that XTX dumping is harmful due to the total amount of XTX, not just the concentration. So, if companies dilute their waste but end up dumping the same amount overall, it will do as much harm as if they hadn’t diluted it.

This is irrelevant to the inclusion of the antidilution provision. Without more information (e.g. about how long this breakdown process takes), we can’t say whether this should affect the regulations for XTX disposal in any way.

The opinions of hazardous waste dump owners are irrelevant to the law aiming to reduce environmental harm, so this does not strengthen the antidilution clause.

This does not strengthen the antidilution provision, as the cost of different disposal methods to manufacturers has nothing to do with the safety requirements of the law.