PT7.S1.Q16

PrepTest 7 - Section 1 - Question 16

Hide analysis

Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. ██████████ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███████████ ███ ███████ █ █████████ █████ ███ ████ █████ ████ █████ ████ ████████ █ █████████ ██████ ████████ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ██████████ █████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██████████ ████████

MORE and LESS; BIG and SMALL

The skills tested here are pretty similar to those tested in science RC passages. Before moving to the answer choices, you need a solid understanding of the mechanics at play, especially the MORE / LESS and BIG / SMALL relationships. First off, we’ve got a general rule that helps us estimate comets’ size based on how much light they reflect. This core relationship never changes:

More light means a bigger comet.

Then we’ve got a comparison between what we used to think and what we think now. We’ve learned that for Halley’s comet, each unit of mass corresponds to way less reflected light than we used to think. Here’s an example with some numbers:

As a baseline, let’s say we previously thought there was a 1:1 relationship between light and mass. That is, when we looked in our telescope and saw 10 light units, we’d be like “cool, that means the comet is 10 mass units.”
Now we’ve learned the actual relationship is 1 light : 60 mass. Now when we look in our telescope and see 10 light units, we think “oh snap, the comet is more like 600 mass units.”

Learning that Halley’s comet is less reflective than we thought means it’s bigger than we thought (according to our estimate).

Show answer
16.

The statements above, if true, ████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████

a

Some comets are ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ████████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ██████████ █████ ██ █████████

This isn’t an entirely unreasonable inference. It’s wrong because it’s much less well supported than (B), not because it’s completely unsupported.

The main assumption (A) makes is that we previously thought Halley’s was a somewhat normal comet and not some crazy outlier. Like if we used to think Halley’s is made of iron, probably there are some other comets also made of iron.

But the stimulus never discusses other comets at all – we’ve only got information comparing our old understanding of Haley’s to our new one. So the inference about other comets is based purely on facts we’re bringing in from the outside. It might be a fair guess in the real world, though.

5%
b

Previous estimates of ███ ████ ██ ██████████ █████ █████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ███ ████

Confirming (B) means tracking all the UP and DOWN relationships.

See the analysis section for a walkthrough of why learning that Halley’s comet is less reflective than we thought means it’s bigger than we thought (according to our estimate).

53%
c

The total amount ██ █████ █████████ ████ ██████████ █████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ████████

The amount of light reflected off the comet has presumably stayed the same. At least, we have no indication that we’re seeing more or less light than before. What has changed is the inference we make based on the light we’re seeing.

24%
d

The reflective properties ██ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ ████████████ ████ █████ ██ ██████

Similar to (A), there’s some reason to believe that our previous baseline understanding of how reflective comets are was based on knowledge of other comets that are more reflective than Halley’s. That’s not an entirely unreasonable inference – it’s just much less well supported than (B).

12%
e

Scientists need more ███████████ ██████ ████ ███ ████ █ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ██████

“Good” should ring some alarm bells, since it sets a normative standard – a value judgement about how estimates ought to be. It’s not a moral or ethical judgment, of course – it’s more a judgment about what counts as proper science – but that’s okay. What’s important is that the stimulus features only descriptive claims about what the estimate is, without commenting on what makes estimates good or bad.

6%

Confirm action

Are you sure?