PT145.S2.Q11 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

It’s not a good idea for farmers to grow genetically engineered crops, because studies that are critical of those foods could be published, increasing public distrust. This leads to great financial risk, and crop prices don’t compensate for that risk.

The conclusion is a judgment against large-scale genetically engineered crops: “It is unwise for farmers to grow such crops.”

This is a sub-conclusion. It is supported by the premise that at any time a study could be published that would reduce consumer confidence in genetically engineered foods. The sub-conclusion in turn supports the conclusion that farmers are unwise to grow such crops.

This rephrases the conclusion.

This is a premise: the rewards of growing genetically engineered crops do not outweigh the risks, which supports the conclusion that it is unwise for farmers to grow them.

This is a premise. It supports the sub-conclusion that there is great financial risk associated with growing genetically engineered crops.

This is a premise. Consumers having little confidence in these foods (and the possibility of a study diminishing this confidence further) supports the sub-conclusion that there is great financial risk associated with growing genetically engineered crops.

PrepTest 145 - Section 2 - Question 11

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action