Support Some of the world’s most beautiful cats are Persian cats. ████████ ██ ████ ██ ████████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ████████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████████ ███████████
The stimulus starts with a "some" statement. Some of the world's most beautiful cats are Persian cats:
beautiful cats ←s→ Persian cats
The next sentence gives us a conditional statement. All Persian cats are pompous:
Persian cat → pompous
The last sentence gives us another conditional statement. Pompous cats are invariably (i.e., all) irritating:
pompous → irritating
The stimulus doesn't actually present us with a conclusion of its own, just with premises we can use to draw our own inferences. We have one "some" statement: some of the world's most beautiful cats are Persian cats. We also have two conditional statements: all Persian cats are pompous and all pompous cats are irritating. We can chain all these claims up to yield a few inferences: some of the world's most beautiful cats are pompous; some of the world's most beautiful cats are irritating; and all Persian cats are irritating.
beautiful cats ←s→ Persian cat → pompous → irritating
_____
beautiful cats ←s→ pompous
beautiful cats ←s→ irritating
Persian cat → irritating
For this question, we're looking for four statements that must be true, and one that is not required by the stimulus. We can expect to see four variants of the inferences we've made above.
Analysis by ArdaschirArguelles
If the statements above are █████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ████ ███████
Some of the █████████ ████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████
Some irritating cats ███ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████████ █████
Any cat that ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █ ███████ ████
Some pompous cats ███ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████████ █████
Some irritating and █████████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ █████