Much of the best scientific research of today shows that many of the results of earlier scientific work that was regarded in its time as good are in fact mistaken. ███ ███████ ███ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ████████ ███ █████████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ █████
The stimulus makes a few claims that might seem to be in tension with each other. First, we're told that much of today's best scientific research shows that scientific work considered good in the past produced many mistaken results. We're also told that scientists are "above all concerned to discover the truth," which might lead us to conclude that scientists should ignore this mistaken scientific work from the past. But instead the stimulus tells us that it is valuable for today's scientists to study the accounts of earlier scientific work.
There isn't really much of a tension in this stimulus. The claim is not that scientists should accept the mistaken results of earlier scientific work, just that it is "valuable" for them to study the firsthand accounts of earlier scientific work. This might be because studying these accounts will help them avoid similar errors to the ones that led to the mistaken results in the first place.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ █████ ████ █████████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██████
Many firsthand accounts ██ ████████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ██ █████████
Lessons in scientific ███████████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ██ ██████████
Scientists can make ████████ █████████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ████ ████ █████ ██ █████ ██ ██ █████████
There are many ██████████ █████ ███ ███ ███ ██████████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██████████ █████████
Some of the ██████ ██████████ ████████ ██ █████ ████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███████ ██████████ █████