Question 12 is a necessary assumption question. Let's take a look at this argument.

When you need a will, consulting a lawyer is much more expensive than using do-it-yourself software,

However, what when you're ill, you aren't satisfied with simply getting some valid prescription.

So this is an analogy, right? We're going to do argument by analogy because we started talking

about wills. Now we're talking about being sick. What you pay for your doctor for is your doctor

expert advice concerning a particular illness. Similarly, what you pay for a lawyer for is to

tailor your will's particular circumstances clearly. When you need a will, a lawyer's advice

is always worth paying for. I don't know about that. I mean, how well does this analogy follow?

Right? When you're sick, okay, you're not simply satisfied getting some valid prescription out

there. You pay your doctor for a specific advice, right? Okay, fine, that's fine, right? So the

lawyer is analogous to the doctor, right? And the specific advice is analogous in each situation.

But here we're talking about in contrast to what? You got a lawyer on the one hand, right? You got

a lawyer on the one hand, you got do-it-yourself software on the other hand, right? What if this

thing can also do this thing? That'd be really bad, right? Then it's like, hmm, I don't know

if it's always worth paying for because I have do-it-yourself software, which is way cheaper.

You know, they said it's more, lawyers more expensive. So it's like $2,000, do-it-yourself

software, it's like 20 bucks, right? This is way more expensive. What do you mean it's always worth

paying for? You better make sure for this argument to work, that do-it-yourself software cannot do

nail right on the head. Do-it-yourself software cannot tailor a person's will to meet that person

particular circumstance as well as a lawyer can. Because if you negate this, if it can,

then what do you mean it's not always worth it, right? So the other, A says lawyer's knowledge

and level of expertise is complex with the doctor's. Man, nobody's comparing like, oh,

how complicated a doctor's work is compared to how complicated a lawyer's work is. So what if the

doctor's work is super, like way more complicated? Like, so? This argument is still as strong as it

not satisfied with the result. Yeah, this doesn't have to be true. Even if everyone was satisfied,

this argument could still stand, right? Because you don't want to confuse satisfaction for being

tailored, right? I mean, imagine actually a suit. You could be satisfied with how the suit sits on

you without it actually fitting you really well, because maybe you just have really bad taste in

clothing, right? It's like a terribly fitting suit, but you're satisfied because what do you know?

Do you see? So it could still be that if you had paid a tailor, they could have made the tailor

suit to, you know, actually tailor it to fit you. Just like how here, you're satisfied with the

will. That doesn't mean it's good. It could be, in fact, a terrible will, right? That totally

screws over everybody and creates a lot of drama in your family. Yet you're satisfied with it

because you don't know any better, right? So maybe it would have been worth to pay a lawyer, worth it

to pay a lawyer to tailor your will to your particular circumstance, right? Do you see that?

So you don't want to confuse satisfaction with, well, I mean, whatever it is we're talking about

up here. Satisfaction is just satisfaction. D says in the majority of cases, valid wills do not

wills just suck. All right. And now are, were the valid wills prepared by lawyers or do-it-yourself

software? We have no idea, right? They just said valid wills. I mean, both can get you a valid

will, right? So D is useless. And lastly, E says there is some valid way for an ill person to get

isn't. Right? That's in the medical world. Can an ill person, under the current way we set up our

medical system, can an ill person get a valid prescription without consulting a doctor? Yes,

no, I don't care. Right? Because we're trying to say whether it's worth it to pay your lawyer.

Like who cares about the answer to this question? Right? Do you see that? It's not,

this is not the part of the analogy that we're trying to carry over.