Question 24 is a most strongly supported question. It's a really tough one. I think probably you get this one right by process of elimination.

For a work to be rightly thought of as world literature, it must be received and interpreted within the writer's own national tradition and within external national tradition.

So we know that we're talking about, we're laying out necessary conditions for something to count as world literature.

We're laying out two necessary conditions. It must do one and two. So what is the one and what is the two?

Well, first it must be received within the writer's, let's just say we're American.

So it must be received within America, the American tradition. And it must be interpreted within the American tradition.

That's the one thing. So I'm going to say capital R for received within your own national tradition.

So here in this case, it's America. And something else. And it must be interpreted within your own, the writer's own national tradition.

In this case, again, it's America. But that's not enough. Here's the conjunctive necessary condition.

It must do this and it must do this. And we repeat the language. It must be received within external national traditions, plural.

So I'm going to go with what international. So like Canada, Canada and Mexico, Canada, Mexico, plus also interpreted Canada and Mexico.

OK, so next sentence, a work counts as being interpreted within a national tradition if so we're laying out sufficiency conditions for what counts as interpreted.

And this is where you want to be careful. They're not just laying out the sufficiency condition for this thing here.

They're laying out the sufficiency conditions for both of these things here.

You might be thinking, wait a second, they said national. This is national. This is international, isn't it?

Well, no, look, look at what they're actually saying here. A word counts as being interpreted within a national tradition if authors from that tradition use the work in at least one of three ways.

So if you satisfy one, we have to deal with one, two, three later. But let's yeah, let's just forget this for now.

Just one, two, three, right? If one of these three is satisfied, then it counts as being interpreted within national tradition.

Right. If authors from that tradition. So if, like, say, Canadian authors use it in this way, then it counts as being interpreted within the Canadian tradition.

If American authors use it in this way, then it counts as being interpreted within the Canadian tradition.

If Mexican authors use it in this way, then it counts as being interpreted within the Mexican tradition. And if American authors use it in, say, this way, then it counts as being interpreted within an American tradition.

So you see, they're not actually just talking about the sufficiency condition for this idea alone.

They're talking about the sufficiency condition for this idea and for this idea.

Right. So I'm not like there's really no elegant way that I know of to represent this.

So let's draw arrows over this way. And I'm going to write one slash two slash three. Right.

One because they're destructive. You just at least one is enough. You don't need all three. Just like two alone is enough to trigger this.

So one, two or three. So what is this one, two, three? Right.

What do we need to do in order for it to count as interpreted within a national tradition, whether it's American or Canadian or Mexican?

Well, you got to do this as a positive model for development of that tradition.

So Mexican authors have to use it as a positive model for development of their Mexican tradition or Canadian authors use it as a negative model to like be like, oh, look at those Americans.

Don't don't do that. Right. So to avoid developing their tradition in that way, or Americans look at it as like a way to refine their home tradition.

Right. So in three ways, somehow in these three ways, one of those three ways. Right.

At this point, we can take a look at the answers. A says a work of literature cannot be well received within an external national tradition.

So you can't you can't contrapose back on it. Right. If it is not. So if not this arrow, not this.

That's terrible. That's totally not supported. A work of world literature offers more to readers within the Canadian tradition than it does to the American.

Right. This is nonsense. C says a work should not be thought of world literature. So this is good. Right.

I can if I fail because world literature has these two conditions, necessary conditions.

If I fail either one of them, I can say it's not world literature. So this is starting out pretty good.

If it what if more meaningful to readers from the writers national tradition.

So if it's more meaningful to American readers than it is to Canadian readers, it doesn't count as what?

What? No. Unfortunately, those are not the failure of these conditions here.

Right. Whether it's more meaningful to American readers versus Mexican readers, that just we don't care about that.

So now the work of world literature is always influenced by work outside of writers own national.

What? So this American work that we said counts as world literature.

It must be influenced by Canadian. Right. Right. This is crazy.

This is received and interpreted within, not influenced.

So that's not good. So this is how you can sort of process your process of elimination your way to E.

And you can just fail one of these things. And this one E effectively fails it because it says it affects the development of only one national tradition.

So you think about that. All three of these are ways to affect. This is the positively affected development.

This is the negatively affected development. And this is the refined which you can be think which you can think of as affecting the development of tradition.

So you have to in order for accounts world literature, you have to do this for America and you have to do it for Canada, Mexico, at the very least.

Because they said traditions, plural, as you got to do it for at least three. So if you're only doing one.

Well, you can't simultaneously satisfy both. I pick one and that's the only one you get.

So you're either failing this or you're failing this. In either case, you get a contraband, contrapose back and say it's not world literature.

That's how you works.