Hundreds of clay tablets marked in cuneiform have been found in excavations of the Sumerian city of Uruk (in present-day Iraq). Though the tablets date from roughly 3000 B.C., the writing on them uses relatively few pictographs; instead, numerous
The earliest of the tokens were simple in form—small cones, spheres, and pyramids—and they were often inscribed. In 1966, a hollow tablet containing several of these tokens was discovered, and more than 100 additional tablets, which are now recognized as sealed envelopes of clay, have since been found. Later envelopes are also inscribed with impressions of tokens in the outer clay, signaling exactly what each envelope contained. …
The token system, essentially a system of three-dimensional nouns, was replaced in about 3100 B.C. by a system of marks on clay tablets. A few centuries later, this latter system was to display the first use of numerals, where simple marks coded the concepts of one, two, and so forth. The eventual evolution of this system into mature writing, Schmandt-Besserat suggests, can be seen in the following example: At first it took two ovoid tokens to record two jars of oil. A little later, it took two markings on a clay tablet to achieve this—one mark, using the outline of the old token, to record the customary unit measure for oil, the jarful, and a second mark to convey the numeral: two oil jars. Eventually, it took three signs on the tablet, one for the numeral 2, one for the standard jarful, and a new symbol that denoted oil itself. With three such signs, an abstract and flexible written form had arrived.
The passage states that the writing on clay tablets found in Uruk
was not deciphered by archaeologists until 1992
Not stated. We know Schmandt-Besserat published her book in 1992. That doesn’t mean nobody had deciphered the clay tablets from Uruk before that year.
used relatively few pictographic symbols
eventually evolved into a more abstract and flexible linguistic system
Not stated about the tablets from Uruk. This is what Schmandt-Besserat believes about the tokens.
transcribed a language that was commonly spoken along the Jordan and nearby rivers
Not stated. The reference in the passage to the Jordan and nearby rivers relates to the clay tokens, not the tablets from Uruk.
transcribed a language that was much older than archaeologists would have expected
Not stated. Although the passage states that researchers were “puzzled” by the “seemingly sudden appearance of such abstract writing” on the tablets, that doesn’t indicate that archaeologists wouldn’t have expected writing to appear such a long time ago. The issue is the suddenness of its appearance, not how long ago the writing appeared.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnostic