PT155.S1.Q14

PrepTest 155 - Section 1 - Question 14

Hide analysis

Jones: A budget deficit is good for the country's finances; it discourages excessive government spending.

█████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ████ ████████ ███ ██████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ █████ ██ █ ████ █████ ███ ████ ████████ ███████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████ ████████ ████████████ █████ ████ ████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████ █████ ████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ████ ████████ ████████████ ████ █████ ████ █████████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██████ ███ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ███ ████████████

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

Jones concludes that a budget deficit is good for the country’s finances. This is because he believes a budget deficit discourage excessive government spending.

Espinosa criticizes Jones’s argument by using analogy. In the analogous argument, someone might argue that reaching the credit limit on credit cards is a good thing because it discourages you from spending excessively. Espinosa points out that this argument doesn’t make sense, because reaching the credit card limit shows bad financial management. Espinosa points out that just as someone should avoid getting into debt, governments should also try to avoid debt.

Describe Method of Reasoning

Espinosa uses an analogous argument to show that Jones’s argument is not persuasive.

Show answer
14.

The strategy Espinosa uses in ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ██

a

provide an argument ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██ █████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██████████

Espinosa provides a flawed analogous argument (that reaching credit limit is good because it discourages spending) to show that Jones’s argument is similarly flawed.

90%
b

demonstrate that Jones's ████████ ███████████ ████ ██ ████ ███ ██ █████

(B) describes circular reasoning. Espinosa does not accuse Jones’s argument of restating its conclusion as one of its premises.

4%
c

offer empirical evidence ████ ██████████ ███████ ██████████

Espinosa does not offer any empirical evidence. (Empirical evidence is based on things that are actually observed or measured.)

3%
d

argue that Jones's █████████ █████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ████████

Espinosa does not comment on Jones’s own management of personal finances.

1%
e

suggest that Jones's ██████████ ██ ████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ████████

Espinosa does not suggest that the reason Jones’s conclusion is flawed is that it is too general.

3%

Confirm action

Are you sure?