Self-study
When expert witnesses give testimony, jurors often do not understand the technical information and thereby are in no position to evaluate such testimony. ████████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████████ █████ █████ ████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ █████ ██████████ ████ ██████████ ███████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ████████████
Summary
Jurors often do not understand the technical information provided by expert witnesses. Although these expert witnesses may make conflicting claims, both appear confident, leaving juries unable to assess how reliable their testimonies are.
Strongly Supported Conclusions
Juries may be swayed by factors other than reliability in a trial with expert testimony.
17.
The statements above, if true, ████ ████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
a
There should be ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ███████████ ███ ██ ██████████ ██ ████ █████ ██ █████████ █ █████ █████
This is too strong. The stimulus does not advocate for any limits to be placed on technical information. It purely focuses on jurors’ ability to understand it.
b
Jury decisions in █████ █████████ ██████ ███████ ███████████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ████████████
The stimulus argues that jurors often cannot assess the reliability of expert witness testimonies. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that decisions involving expert witness testimonies are not always determined by their reliability.
c
Jurors who understand ███ █████████ ███████████ █████████ ██ █ ████ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ █████ ████████████ ███████████
The stimulus does not explain how jurors utilize accurately understood technical information. While it seems plausible, this is too much of an assumption.
d
Jury members should █████████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████████ ██████████
The stimulus does not argue for any change in how jurors should be selected. This requires many assumptions to be correct.
e
Expert witnesses who ███████ ██ ████████ █████ ██ █████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ █████ ██ █████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ███████
This is anti-supported. The stimulus says that expert witnesses on opposite sides make conflicting claims.