The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society. ████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███ ███████ █████████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ █████████ ████ ██████ ████████ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ███████████████ ███
██████ ██████████ ███████ ████ ████ ██████ ███████████ ████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ███████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ███ ████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███ █████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ████████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ██████ ████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ██ ██ ████████ ███ ██ ██ ██████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ███ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████ █████ ███
██████ ███ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ ██ ████████████ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ███████ ██████ ██████████ ██████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ █████ █████ ██ ███████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████████████ ███████ ██████ █ ██████████████ ██ ████████ ███
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████
Gilman's activist social ███████ █████ ██████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████████ ████ ██████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ █████████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ████ ██████████████████ ██████ █████████ █████
The main point isn’t about the differences between two different kinds of Social Darwinism. The main point is about what Gilman believed. It’s also not clear that the abolition of gender-specific work roles is part of the “central doctrine” of the activist Social Darwin camp.
Although Gilman aligned ███████ ████ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ██████ ███████████ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ███ ██████ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ███████████ ██ █████████████ ██████ ██████████
We don’t know that other activist Social Darwinists disagreed with the idea of gender equality. So it doesn’t make sense to characterize Gilman as rejecting the doctrines of other activist Social Darwinists.
Unlike most Social ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ██████ ███ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ██████ █████████ ██████ ██ ████████████ ████████ ███████████ ████████ ███ ██████ █████████ ████████████ ███ █████ ████████ ██████████ ███ ██████
Gilman was aligned with the activist group of Social Darwinists. The author never suggests that Gilman wasn’t similar to “most” Social Darwinists of her time. She may have been different from the non-activist Social Darwinists, but we don’t know that they were “most” Social Darwinists.
Gilman's version of ██████ █████████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ █████████ ███ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ███████ █████ ██ ██ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ █████████ ███████████ ██████ ██████
This best captures the main point, which is a description of Gilman’s views. Gilman believed that people had an
Gilman, whose important █████████████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ ████████ ████ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ████████ ██████ ████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ███████
The author isn’t trying to persuade us that Gilman should be recognized for her writings on social issues. The author is merely telling us about Gilman’s views. There’s a difference between telling us about someone’s views and arguing that those views should be recognized.