PT150.S1.P4.Q26

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

Too strong. There’s no support for the “only” major reduction in size occuring 100,000 years ago. We know that there are signs of a reduction 100,000 years ago; but we also know that there has been a reduction “over evolutionary time.” So there may be further reduction more recently than 100,000 years ago, and some of these might be major reductions.

Not supported, because the “high-meat” diet isn’t brought up in P2. It’s brought up in P3 in connection with a discussion of the soft parts of the digestive system. But the question stem asks us what is suggested in the “second paragraph.” In any case, (B) isn’t supported by P3 either because the author doesn’t suggest that humans have difficulty surviving on a high-meat diet. Rather, they have difficulty surviving on a raw-food diet.

This relates to P3. But P2 is about jaw and tooth size, not the human digestive anatomy.

Not supported, because nothing in P2 suggests that cooking was adopted by different populations of early humans “at the same time.” Although we do know that populations in different areas did engage in cooking, there’s no evidence the author thinks they all began cooking at the same time.