It might reasonably have been expected that the adoption of cooking by early humans would not have led to any changes in human digestive anatomy. █████ ████ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ██ ████ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ █████ ███
Other People’s Argument ·Cooking didn’t lead to changes in human digestive anatomy
Author's Hypothesis ·Cooking evolutionarily changed human digestion
We evolved to efficiently digest high and densely caloric foods thanks to cooking. Now we are reliant on cooked foods and cannot survive on raw food alone.
Cooking resulted in decrease in tooth and jaw size. Evidence of cooking techniques developing and decreases in tooth and jaw size support the cooking hypothesis.
Future Research ·More testing required to better understand raw v. cooked
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
20.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Main point
The author focuses on establishing that humans have become biologically adapted to eating cooked food. She supports this view in P2 and shows that this view can also be supported by additional evidence traditionally thought to support a different view in P3.
a
Important questions about ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████
This doesn’t capture the author’s view that humans have biologically adapted to eating cooked food. The author’s point isn’t that something is unresolved; it’s that there’s an answer to why humans can’t survive on raw food except in unusual circumstances.
This doesn’t capture the author’s view that humans are biologically adapted to eating cooked food. The author’s point isn’t that we’ve had a change in dietary habits. It’s that changes in dietary habits (eating cooked instead of raw food) have affected our biology such that we can’t survive on raw food anymore except in special circumstances.
d
For at least ███████ ██████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ █ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ██████ █████
This may be supported, but it doesn’t capture the author’s view that humans are biologically adapted to eating cooked food. If the author advocates for a hypothesis, the main point should capture that hypothesis.
e
No special biological ███████████ ████ █████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ██ ████
This is stated by the author, but it’s not the main point, because it doesn’t capture the author’s view that humans are biologically adapted to eating cooked food. If the author advocates for a hypothesis, the main point should capture that hypothesis.
Difficulty
79% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is significantly easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%125
141
75%158
Analysis
Main point
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
14%
161
b
79%
163
c
5%
153
d
1%
153
e
1%
154
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.