Support ·Appellate courts don't have important tools for figuring out what's true
Live testimony from experts can help judges understand scientific stuff, and cross-examination of those experts can help discover what's true. Appellate judges don't get these things, since they happen only at the trial level.
Support ·Appellate courts who do research risk reaching bad results; they also shouldn't read stuff that wasn't presented to the trial court
Passage Style
25.
Which one of the following █████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ █ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██
Question Type
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
We only need to consider passage B for this one. The author says that appellate courts can’t test scientific evidence in the “crucible” of the adversarial system. This comes just after the discussion in P5 about how this kind of evidence can be tested during trials through cross-examination. So when the author talks about a “crucible,” he’s talking about the process of cross-examination. We’re looking for another word he uses to refer to cross-examination.
a
temptation (first sentence ██ ███████ ██
The author uses this word to describe the desire some judges may have to do independent research, which he disapproves of. But when the author uses the word “crucible,” he’s describing something he approves of: the process of cross-examination in a trial.
When the author talks about a “crucible,” he’s referring to the process of cross-examination. And he says that cross-examination is a means to test the “credibility” of evidence. So “credibility” refers to a characteristic of evidence, while “crucible” refers to a specific trial process.
The author uses this word to refer to the process of cross-examination, which is the same thing he’s referring to by the word “crucible.” The author says that appellate courts can’t test scientific evidence in the “crucible” of the adversarial system. This comes just after the discussion in P5 about how this kind of evidence can be tested during trials through the “legal engine” of cross-examination. So when the author talks about a “crucible” or an “engine,” he’s referring to cross-examination.
d
function (second sentence ██ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██
When the author talks about a “crucible,” he’s referring to the process of cross-examination. When he talks about a “function,” he’s referring to an overall purpose of trial courts. And he doesn’t suggest that cross-examination is the overall purpose of trial courts. Rather, fact-finding is the purpose, and cross-examination is simply one way in which that’s done. So although “crucible” and “function” are related, they’re not referring to the same thing.
e
medium (final sentence ██ ███████ ██
The author uses this word when describing the kinds of independent research sources appellate judges shouldn’t use. But when the author uses the word “crucible,” he’s not talking about independent research—he’s talking about the process of cross-examination in a trial.
Difficulty
59% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%152
159
75%167
Analysis
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Comparative
Law
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
156
b
9%
156
c
59%
165
d
15%
158
e
15%
160
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.