PT151.S4.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that the criminalization of certain kinds of speech is justified, because they are likely to lead directly to serious harm.

The conclusion is the author’s judgment about free speech restrictions: “The criminalization of these forms of speech is justified.”

This is a paraphrase of the conclusion. The author argues that it is legitimate (justified), to prohibit (criminalize) some forms of speech.

“Only if” describes a necessary condition for restricting speech. The author never argued that anything was necessary for restricting speech.

The author never argued that restricting speech usually leads to serious harm.

The author never argued that any form of speech can lead to serious harm.

The conclusion isn’t about what reasons for restricting speech are unjustified. Rather, the conclusion is that certain restrictions are justified.

PrepTest 151 - Section 4 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action