Scientist: A number of errors can plague a data-collection process. βββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββββ ββ β ββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ
Why does corrected data in the scientistβs field tend to align more with Jonesβs theory more than does uncorrected data?
The right answer will be a hypothesis that explains why these data corrections gravitate towards what Jonesβs theory predicts. The explanation must either signal that Jonesβs theory is correct and errors naturally stray from the theory, or that those doing the data corrections are themselves biased towards Jonesβs theory.
Which one of the following, ββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββ
Researchers normally give ββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββββ β ββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ
The question is why data corrections favor a particular theory, not how data is used in evaluating a theory. This just isn't relevant to the data correction process.
Researchers in the βββββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ
Researchers go looking for errors in data that conflicts with Jonesβs theory. Data that falls in line with Jonesβs theory, on the other hand, goes unremarked and uncorrected. This explains why data corrections favor Jonesβs theory.
Researchers in the βββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ
It doesnβt matter what researchers expect ahead of time, because we're concerned with what happens after data is collected. This doesn't tell us why data corrections align with Jonesβs theory.
Even if researchers ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ β βββββββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββ
This may be true, but why do researchers mainly correct errors in such a way as to bring data in line with Jonesβs theory? This doesnβt tell us enough about the data correction process to know.
Researchers in the βββββββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
So why do data corrections favor Jonesβs theory rather than these other theories? If anything, this only complicates things now that we know there are other theories to choose from.