Support If the glee club pays cash today to rent the equipment it needs for next Saturday's party, its usual rental agency will accept a much lower price than the club would pay for renting the equipment next Saturday. βββ ββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββ
The author concludes that the glee clubβs party committee doesnβt care much about saving money.
What makes the author think this?
Because if the glee club pays cash today to rent certain equipment, it can pay a lot less than it would have to pay for renting the equipment next Saturday.
In addition, the party committee is aware that it could save money by paying cash today.
Still, the committee is deciding to wait until next Saturday to pay for the equipment.
The author assumes that the glee club has the ability to pay cash today for the equipment.
The author also assumes that the club will not be able to save more money by waiting to pay for the equipment. (This overlooks the possibility that the club might use cash today to purchase something else that could save more money, or that the club might invest the cash today and get greater returns than what they would save on the equipment.)
Which one of the following βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ
At least some βββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ
Not necessary, because the negation of (A) arguably helps the argument. If NO influential members of the committee are interested in the savings available by renting the equipment today, that suggests further reason to think the committee doesnβt care much about saving money.
Most members of βββ ββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ
Not necessary, because we already have a premise establishing that the clubβs party committee βknows the costs involved.β This doesnβt require that over half of the members of the committee be aware of the βfinancial situationβ of the club. In addition, βfinancial situationβ is broader than the specific cost savings available concerning the rental equipment. The argument doesnβt require the author to believe anything about the committeeβs awareness of the general βfinancial situationβ of the club.
At least one ββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ β βββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββ
Not necessary, because the argument concerns the potential cost savings from renting at the βusual rental agency.β Other rental agencies are irrelevant.
The club's party βββββββββ βββ β ββββββ ββ ββββββββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββ
Not necessary, because (D) arguably weakens the argument if assumed. If the committee has a number of responsibilities that take priority over saving money, that opens the possibility that they DO care about saving money, but they might need to refrain from paying for the equipment today for other, more important reasons.
There is enough ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββ
Necessary, because if it were not true β if there is NOT enough cash available to the glee club today to pay for the equipment rental at todayβs lower price β then the fact the committee is not renting the equipment today would not establish anything about the committeeβs motivations. It could just reflect inability to pay, not a lack of desire to save.