In order to cut costs and thereby maximize his profit, Mr. ████ ████ ████████ █████████ ██ ████████████ ███ ████████ ███████ █████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ███████ █████ ███ ███ ██ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █████
The author concludes that it was wrong for Kapp to use inferior materials in making the library. Why? Because Kapp must have realized that using inferior materials would put people at serious risk.
What allows us to conclude that an action is wrong? We have no premise that establishes an action is wrong. So, at a minimum, we the correct answer must tell us what makes an action wrong.
To go further, we can anticipate a more specific connection. We want to connect what the premise tells us about Kapp’s action to being wrong. So we want to learn that if someone knows their action puts people at serious risk, then it’s wrong for that person to do the action.
The argument's conclusion is properly █████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Any knowledgeable and ███████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ████████████ █████████ ████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █████
An action can ██ █████ ████ █ █████ ██████████ ███████ ███████████ █████ ████████
Mr. Kapp made █ █████ ██████ ████ ███ ████████████ ███ ████ ██ ███ █████████
It is wrong ██ █████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███████
Mr. Kapp either ████ ██ █████ ██ ████ █████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ █████████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █████