PT155.S3.P1.Q3

PrepTest 155 - Section 3 - Passage 1 - Question 3

Hide analysis

The following passage is adapted from a 2001 article by a film historian.

P1

██ ██████████ █████ ██ █████████████ ██ █ ████████ █ ███████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ █████ █████ ██████ ██ █████████ █████████ ███

Question · Which works of art should be shown together?
██ ████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ███
Answer 1 · Group art according to artist
E.g. Rembrandt paintings
███████ ██████████ ██████ █████ ██ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ █ ██████████ █████ ██ ██ █ ██████████ ██████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███
Answer 2 · Group art according to theme/period
E.g., Modernist art
██ ███ █████ ███ ███ ██ ██ ██████ █ ██████ ██ █████ ████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███
Similarity · Both answers use common characteristics to group art togther
██ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ █ ██████████ █████████ █████ ███████ ████ ███
Analogy · Film retrospectives are like art exhibits
Similar works of film are grouped by a common feature and screened together
██ ██████ █████ █ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ ███████████████

narrowing topic · Early nonfiction film retrospectives
P2

███ █ █████ █████ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ █████████████ ███ █████████ █████ █████ ██████████ ███████████ ███████ ██ █████ ███████ ███████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ███ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ █████ █████ █████ ████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███

Main point / author's criticism · Early films shouldn't be grouped by similarity
Premise: such films were never originally shown this way
█████████ ████████ ███████ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ████ █████ ████ █████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███████ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ███████████ ██████████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████████████ █████ ███████████ █████ ███ █ ██████████ ██ ███████ █████ ████████ █████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ███ █ ███████ ████ ███ █ ███ ██ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ███ █████ █ █████ ███████ ███ ███ █████

Support criticism · Original format for screening films
Author gives more detail: instead of grouping similar films together, cinemas originally showed different films together in "mixed program"
P3

████ ████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ █████ ██████ ██ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ████████ █████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ █████ ██ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ██████████ █████████ █████ ████████████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ ███████ ██ █████████ █████████ ██ ███████████ ██████ ███

target of criticism · Film archives and retrospective festivals
Their priority is to showcase how films supposedly originally looked; author implies this shouldn't be sole priority
███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ████████████ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ███████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ██ ███████████ ████████ ███████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ████ ███ ████████ █ ███████ ████ ███████ ██████████ █████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ███████ █████ █████ ██ ██████ ███
support criticism · Authenticity in how films were originally grouped is important
Screening films in mixed-program format adds context and improves viewing experience
████ ██████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ █████ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ █████ ████████ ██████

clarify main point · Exhibition of early films shouldn't ignore the context in which they were originally viewed
Passage Style
Problem-analysis
Single position
Show answer
3.

The author would be most ██████ ██ ██████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████

a

Works of art ██████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████████ ██ █████████

The author would agree with this.

7%
b

Dissimilar works of ███ ██████ █████ ██ █████████ █████████

The author would disagree with this. He argues that dissimilar films should be displayed together.

75%
c

Contemporary exhibitions of █████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ███████████ █████████ █████ █████████

The author would agree with this.

7%
d

Art exhibitions should █████ ██ ████████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████

This says exhibitions should always at least consider how each work contributes to the whole. The author never suggests otherwise, so we can’t say he’d disagree.

6%
e

Art exhibitions should █████████ ███████ █████ ████ ███ ███ ██ ███ ████ ███████

The author gives no opinion on this.

5%

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic
More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

Confirm action

Are you sure?