PT157.S4.P3.Q18

PrepTest 157 - Section 4 - Passage 3 - Question 18

Hide analysis
P1

Political arguments about biodiversity and the preservation of endangered species generally assume we know what a species is. ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ ███

Context · What's a "species"? Arguments about biodiversity assume we know this.
██████ ██████████████ ████████ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ████████ █████████ ███ █████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ ███████ █████████ ███ ████████████ ███████ █████ ███ █████ ████████ ███ ████ ███████ ███████████ ██ █████ ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ██████ ████ ███████████ ████ ████ ████████ ███
Debate among ornithologists · Lumpers vs. splitters
Lumpers group separate, but similar bird populations into a single species. Splitters divide those populations into different species.
██████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████ ████████ █████ █████ ████████ ███ ███ ████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ███████████████ ███ ██████████ ██████ █ ███████ ██ █ █████ ████ ██ ██████████████ ████████ ████ █████ ███████ █████ █████ ████ █████ ██ ██ ███████████ █████████████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ███
Lumpers' perspective · Biological species concept
A species is a group that is reproductively isolated from other groups (not a lot of interbreeding in the wild between the groups).
██████████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ████████████ ███████ ████████████ ███████ ████████ █████ ███████ █ ███████ ██ █ █████████████ ███████████ █████ █████ █████ ██ █ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ████████ █ ████████████ ███████ ██ █ ██████████ ██ █████ ███████ █████ █ ████████████ ███████████ █████████ ███████ ████ █████████████ ██ ████ █████ ████████████

Splitters' perspective · Phylogenetic species concept
A species is a population which has a pattern of ancestry and descent. Members of a species have a distinctive, genetically traceable feature.
P2

███ ████ ███████ ██ ███████ █ █████████ █████████████ ███ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █ █████████████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████████ █████ ██ ██████ █ █████████ ██ ████ █ ███████ █████ ██ ███████ █████████████████████ ████████ ███ ████ █████████ ████████████ █████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███

Intro to Sibley · Part of splitters. Used DNA-DNA hybridization.
This technique compares DNA to determine relationships between different groups birds.
████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ████ ████ ███████ ███████████████ ██ ███ █████████████ ██ ████ ████████ ████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ████ ████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ █████ ███████ ████ ████ ███████ ███████ ██ ██████ ████ ██ ████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ████ ███████ ████████ ████ ████

Sibley's perspective · Many earlier bird classifications were wrong
Examples: American vultures are more related to storks than European vultures. Loons and grebes aren't closely related.
P3

████████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ██████ █████████ █████ ███ ███ ████ ███ ████ ███ ██ ██ █████████████ ██ ███ █████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ███ █████████ █████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ █████████ ███

One criticism of sibley (not by author) · DNA analysis still requires arbitrary interpretation
DNA shows differences between groups. But there's no clear line when those differences signify different species.
██████ █████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ████ ██████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████████ ███████ ███████████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███ █████████ ████████ ██ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ █████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ██████████ █████ ██ ███████ █████████ ███ ███ ████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ████ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ███████████ ███ ███████

Sibley's potential response · Acknowledges that "species concept" is slippery
However, for practical reasons, we have to limit the number of species we recognize. (If we said you were a different species from your mom, because you have slightly different DNA, that would lead to billions of different "species" in the world. That's impractical.)
P4

████████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ █████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █████ ████████ ████████ ███ ██████ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████

Implications of debate · How we answer the species question has political and economic consequences
Example: Increasing number of species would likely increase number of endangered species.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Show answer
18.

Which one of the following ████ ██████████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████████

a

There is strong ████████ ████ ████ ███████████ █ ███ █ █████ █ ██████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ███████ █████████

It’s the phylogenetic species concept (used by splitters), not the biological species concept (used by lumpers) that cares about common ancestors. (A) doesn’t say whether or not populations X and Y reproduce with each other, so we don’t know how to classify them based on the biological species concept.

5%
b

Bird populations X ███ █ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ████ █████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ █████████ ████████

According to the biological species concept, a species is a group that is reproductively isolated from other groups. In (B), X and Y interbreed in the wild, so they’re not reproductively isolated from each other. Because of this, we should not classify them as different species under the biological species concept. (B) says that they should be classified as different species, so (B) doesn’t accurately apply the biological species concept.

5%
c

Bird populations X ███ █ ███ ████████ █████████████████ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████████ █████████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ████████

The biological species concept is about reproductive isolation, not about appearance. (C) doesn’t tell us if the two populations reproduce with each other, so we don’t know how to classify them according to the biological species concept.

13%
d

Although bird populations █ ███ █ ████ ███████████ ██████ █████ ███ ████ █████████ ████ ████████████ ███████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ████████

According to the biological species concept, a species is a group that is reproductively isolated from other groups. In the example in (D), populations X and Y are not reproductively isolated from each other, so they should be classified as belonging to the same species. (D) accurately applies the biological species concept.

63%
e

Although bird populations █ ███ █ ████ █████ ████ █████ ██ ███████████ ████ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ███████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ █████████ █ ██████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ████████

The biological species concept is about reproductive isolation, not about appearance. (E) says that the two populations have never been known to interbreed, so we should not classify them as the same species according to the biological species concept. Additionally, it’s the phylogenetic species concept (used by splitters), not the biological species concept (used by lumpers) that cares about common ancestors.

14%

Confirm action

Are you sure?