Wrong flaw. This establishes three disjunctive criteria (meaning only one of the three must be met) to be an officer, but only establishes that Evelyn fails to meet two of them. She may have special qualifications. There’s no false dichotomy here, which is the stimulus’s flaw.

No flaw. Location in a sunny spot and regular watering are established as necessary conditions for the plant to thrive, so it’s reasonable to conclude that the plant is not optimally healthy because it hasn’t met either of those conditions.

This creates a false dichotomy. It assumes that the book must be loved since it hasn’t received a hostile review, but these should not be considered the only two possible options. Perhaps the critics felt indifferent towards it and gave neutral reviews.

Wrong flaw. This makes two assumptions. First, it assumes that there actually has been a decision in favor of developing the northern border. Second, it assumes that if it’s acceptable to develop the others that one of them actually will be developed. Regardless, there’s no false dichotomy in (D), which is the stimulus’s flaw.

Wrong flaw. This establishes a sufficient condition for society to crash to halt, but treats it as though it’s the only way for a society to crash to a halt. There’s no false dichotomy in (E), which is the flaw found in the stimulus.