Pundit: The only airline providing service for our town announced that because the service is unprofitable it will discontinue this service next year. ████ █████████ ████ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ███ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████████ ██ ████ ███ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ████ █████ ███████████████ ████████ ███ ████ ████ ████ █████ ████ █████████ █████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ███████
The pundit states that the people of his town should not follow the recommendation of their town council to increase their usage of their local airline. He supports his statement by citing an example of the town council’s behavior, where they opted to drive to an event instead of fly.
The pundit does not explain why the town council drove to the event instead of flying. Maybe there was no airport to land at in their destination, or a council member could not fly for medical or personal reasons. Without knowing why the council members chose to drive instead of flying, the pundit’s argument rests on the sentiment that the credibility of the council’s recommendations depends on whether or not the council members follow the recommendations themselves, which would not be a good reason to discredit the council.
The pundit's reasoning is most ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ███████ █████████ ██████████████ ████
increasing the number ██ ███████ ████ ███████ ██████████ ██████ ██████ ████ ██ ██████████ ██ ████ █████████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ████████
suspending service and ██████ █████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ███ ███ █████████ ████ ███████
the town officials ████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ████ █████ ███ █████
ground transportation is ███████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ████████ ██████████████
if the town █████████ ███ ███ ██████ █████ ███ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ █████████