Conclusion The best way to write a good detective story is to work backward from the crime. βββ ββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ βββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββββββββββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ
The author states that when writing a detective story, one should work backwards β first deciding on the crime, and then filling in the circumstances and clues. The author is saying to start with the big thing, and then figure out the details and groundwork.
Which one of the following βββββββββββ β βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ
When planning a βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ
(A) says that before deciding on a location for a trip (the big thing), most people need to do a lot of financial planning first (the details/groundwork). This is the opposite of the argument in the stimulus. (A) says people need to start with the details before deciding the big thing.
In planting a βββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββ
(B) says that you should prepare the soil before deciding what vegetables to plant. In other words, you should lay the groundwork before making the big decision of what to plant. This is the opposite of the argument, which says that you should make the big decision (the crime) before laying the groundwork (coming up with circumstances and clues).
Good architects do βββ ββββββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ
(C) says that when making the big decision (building plans), architects need to be thinking about the details (method of construction). This is different from the argument in the stimulus, which says you should make the big decision before filling in the details.
In solving mathematical βββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββ βββ βββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ
(D) doesnβt talk at all about where one should start in solving a mathematical problem. The argument in the stimulus is about chronology, so (D) doesnβt apply a similar principle.
To make a βββββ ββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββ ββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ
(E) says that to make a tennis shot, you should start with where you want the shot to go (the big thing), and then figure out where you need to be to execute the shot (the details/groundwork). This is the same reasoning used in the stimulus.