Philosopher: Effective tests have recently been developed to predict fatal diseases having a largely genetic basis. ββββ βββ βββ βββββ βββββ β ββββββ βββ ββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββ β βββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ
The philosopher says that we can now effectively test people for some genetically-based deadly diseases, so we can warn people in advance if theyβre at risk. Unfortunately, we canβt prevent most of these conditions yet. Whatβs more, learning that you will get a deadly and unpreventable disease can be psychologically harmful. So, the philosopher wonders whether we should use these tests at all.
The philosopherβs claims support these principles:
Having more knowledge of oneβs future health risks is not always beneficial for health.
If new medical tests risk causing people harm while not offering the possibility of a cure, it may be best not to conduct the tests.
Developments in medicine can lead to questions of how and when they should be used.
Which one of the following ββββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββ
The advance of ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββ
The advance of ββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ
Medical technologies continue ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The more we ββββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββ
The advance of ββββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ