βββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ βββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββ β ββββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ
ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ β βββββ ββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββββββ βββ
βββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββ
It can be most reasonably ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ
arbitrary
The author never suggests the strategy was random or involved an unreasonable process.
inflexible
The author never suggests the strategy wasnβt adaptable.
unprecedented
Supported, because the strategy was an β
necessary
The author never suggests that the test case strategy was necessary in order for Marshall to achieve his success. Although it did contribute to his success, that doesnβt imply it was required. Also, if youβre looking at the word βessentialβ in P2, that word isnβt used to describe the test case strategy. Itβs used to describe a component of the test case strategy β that component is necessary to the test case strategy, but we donβt know whether the strategy itself is necessary for something else.
subjective
The author never suggests that the test case strategy was based on personal tastes or feelings or other kinds of subjective criteria. We have no evidence from the passage that Marshallβs criteria for selecting cases were subjective. And no, the mere fact that Marshall evaluated precedential nuances, potential impacts of decisions, and the level of public sympathy/appeal/credibility of plaintiffs does not show that Marshallβs selection of cases was subjective. One can use objective criteria to evaluate all of these things. The passage does not tell us enough about the way in which Marshall chose cases to support the characterization that his decision process was subjective.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.