Self-study
P1
The United States government agency responsible for overseeing television and radio broadcasting, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), had an early history of addressing only the concerns of parties with an economic interest in broadcasting—chiefly broadcasting companies. ███
Intro topic ·
FCC and its stakeholders
FCC's perspective ·
Saw itself as responsible only for the concerns of broadcasters
Because broadcasters have an economic stake in broadcasting, whereas members of the general public do not
P2
█ ████████ ████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ █████ █ █████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ███ ████████ ███ █ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████████████ █████████ ███████ ████████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ███ ███ █ ███████ █████ ███ ████████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ███ ██████ ███████ ████ ███ ███████ █████████ ██████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ████████████ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ █████ ██ ████████ ████████ ████████ ███ █ ████████ ███ ███ ████████ ███ █████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ████ █ ███████████ ████████████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ████████ ███████████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ███ █████████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███
Spotlight important development ·
Church opposed renewal of local station's broadcasting license
FCC rejected the church's request for a hearing on the grounds that (1) the church did not have an economic stake in the situation and (2) the FCC already agreed with the church's concerns
Criticize FCC ·
Its behavior was inconsistent with its rationale
Author's perspective ·
FCC's real rationale
FCC wanted to prevent community interest groups from influencing the broadcasting decisions of government and industry
P3
███ ██████ ████████ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██ ████ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ██ █ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ███ █ █████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ██████ ██████ ███ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ███ ███████ █ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ███ █████████████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ██████ ███████ ████ ██████████ █ ██████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████████ ████████
Next important development ·
Multiple appeals by church led to court ruling in their favor
Court revoked station's license, ruled that public concerns are a legitimate reason for challenging FCC decisions
P4
███ ████ ███████████ █ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███████ ██ ██ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ██ █████████████ ██████████ ███████ ████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ███ ██ ███████ ████ █████ █████ ██████
Main point ·
Chuch's appeals created important legal precedent
Requires public concerns to be heard by FCC
Passage Style
Single position
Spotlight
5.
The passage suggests that which ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ██████████
a
Broadcasters are legally █████████ ██ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ████████ █████ ████████████ █████████
The case resulted in opening up of FCC renewal hearings. We don’t know whether broadcasters (such as TV stations) must open their own meetings to the public.
b
Broadcasters are now ████████ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███████ █████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███████████ ██████████
The case resulted in opening up of FCC renewal hearings. We don’t know whether broadcasters (such as TV stations) must consult with citizens groups.
c
Except in cases █████████ █████ ██████████ ██ █ ████████████ ███ ███ ████ ███ ████ ██████ █████ ██ █████████ █████████
The case resulted in opening up of FCC renewal hearings.
d
When evaluating the ███████████ ██ █ ███████████ ████████ ███ █ ███████ ████████ ███ ███ ████ ██████ ███████████ █████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ ███████
The case resulted in opening up of FCC renewal hearings. We don’t know whether the FCC is required to get the preferences of the public; they just need to allow the public to attend and voice their opinion. There’s a difference between letting the public speak and being required to learn the public’s preferences.
e
In FCC licensing ████████████ ███████ ████████████ █████████ ███████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████████ █████ ████ █████ ████ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ █████████████
Supported by the last paragraph: “Subsequent rulings have supported the right of the public to question the performance of radio and television licensees before the FCC at renewal time every three years. Along with racial issues, a range of other matters—from the quality of children's programming and the portrayal of violence to equal time for opposing political viewpoints—are now discussed at licensing proceedings because of the church's intervention.”