PT127.S2.Q22 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

Judicial decisions are rarely of high literary quality, yet it's more likely for dissenting opinions to be of high literary quality.

The right answer will be a hypothesis that explains why dissenting opinions are written in a different way than are judicial decisions.

High literary quality can lead to misinterpretations, so it makes sense why judicial decisions aren’t written that way. We need to know why dissenters sometimes write opinions of high literary quality despite the chance their words are misinterpreted. The explanation must therefore result in the chance of misinterpretation not mattering to those who write dissenting opinions.

Are pieces of writing influenced by multiple people more likely to be of high literary quality? Are dissenting opinions more likely to be influenced by multiple people compared to judicial decisions? This doesn’t tell us.

This doesn’t resolve the discrepancy between judicial decisions and dissenting opinions. We need to know why the latter are more frequently of high literary quality.

Since the law isn’t determined by dissenting opinions, authors of such opinions aren’t concerned about misinterpretation. They’re free to write however they like, which sometimes leads to high literary quality.

This doesn’t explain why dissenting opinions are sometimes of high literary quality. We still don't know what's different about the writing style of dissenting opinions verses judicial decisions to influence their literary quality..

This tells us nothing about dissenting opinions, nor about the writing style that judges use. We need to know why dissenting judges are more likely to write in a literary style.

PrepTest 127 - Section 2 - Question 22

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action