Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, regardless of an organism's social or mental complexity. ████████████ ██ ███ ███████ █████████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ████ ███████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ███████████ ██████ ██ ████ ███
█████████ ███████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███████████ ██████ ██████ ████████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ █████████ ██████ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ █████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ███████ █████ ██ ████ █ █████████ ███
███ █████ ███ ██ █████ ███████ ███ █████████ █████████ ████ ███
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████
Some findings support ███ ██████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ███████ ███████ █████████ ███████ ██ █████████ ██████████ █████ ███████ ███████████████ ███ ████ ██████████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ████████████
This best captures the author’s overall point, because the author focuses on presenting the inclusive fitness theory as a potential explanation for kin recognition and describes evidence supporting it. (A) describes the inclusive fitness theory and the fact that some findings support it.
Current research supports ███ ████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ █ ███████ ██ █████████ █████ █████████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ ████ ████████
(B) isn’t supported. Although the author discusses different methods of kin recognition, she provides no evidence that the number of mechanisms for kin recognition is as high as the number of purposes served by kin recognition. The fact that there may be multiple mechanisms underlying kin recognition and potentially multiple purposes does not imply that the number of mechanisms and the number of purposes are about equal. Since (B) isn’t supported, it can’t be the main point.
Recent research involving █████ ███████████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████████ ████████████ ██████████
The author doesn’t present tiger salamanders as an example that undermines the inclusive fitness theory. Rather, she uses them to show that inclusive fitness theory doesn’t explain every instance of kin recognition. In addition, the purpose of kin recognition “espoused by traditional evolutionary theorists” isn’t the inclusive fitness theory, so it’s not clear that (C) refers to the inclusive fitness theory. Since (C) isn’t supported, and it doesn’t mention the inclusive fitness theory, it can’t be the main point.
New research involving █████ ███████████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ██████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ████████
This doesn’t mention the inclusive fitness theory, so it can’t be the main point. The “traditional theory of natural selection” is not the same thing as inclusive fitness theory.
While traditional evolutionary ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████████ ████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ ███████ ███████
Not supported, because P3 shows that inclusive fitness theory does not explain every instance of kin recognition. Since “fully explained” isn’t supported, it can’t be the main point.