PT136.S2.Q15 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that the cynicism of contemporary journalists does not undermine our society’s well-being. This is based on the fact that journalists have always been cynics.

The author assumes that the well-being of society has not been undermined in the past due to journalists’ cynicism. This overlooks the possibility that society has been undermined from the cynicism that has always existed.

We’re concerned with the cynicism of journalists. The effects of “widespread” cynicism, which would include others besides journalists, doesn’t affect the argument’s reasoning. Also, cynicism being beneficial doesn’t help show that it can undermine well-being.

Whether cynicism increases the information one has about someone has no impact on whether journalists’ cynicism undermines society.

Whether journalists’ cynicism is genuine or not genuine is irrelevant; what matters is whether that cynicism undermines the well-being of society.

Whether accurate descriptions of behavior portray such behavior has selfish has no impact on whether journalists’ cynicism undermines society’s well-being.

This possibility, if true, shows that the fact journalists have always been cynics does not prove their cynicism doesn’t undermine society’s well-being. This well-being has always been undermined as a result of journalists’ cynicism.

PrepTest 136 - Section 2 - Question 15

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action