Subscription pricing
No one who works at Leila's Electronics has received both a poor performance evaluation and a raise. ██████ ███ ███ ████████ █ ██████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ████████ █ ████ ███████████ ███████████
Method of Reasoning
The argument starts by describing a characteristic of a group (if you work at Leila’s Electronics, it’s not possible that you’ve received both a poor performance evaluation and a raise) and then describes characteristics of an individual in that group (Lester hasn’t received a raise so he must have received a poor performance evaluation).
Identify and Describe Flaw
The argument errs because it’s possible that Lester has received neither a raise nor a poor performance evaluation. The argument acts as if because Lester hasn’t received a raise, we can infer that he has received a poor performance evaluation. However, according to the premises, it’s just not possible that an employee of Leila’s Electronics has received both a poor performance evaluation and a raise.
24.
The flawed reasoning in the ████████ █████ ██ ████ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████
a
No one who █████ ██ █ █████ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██ █████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ███
b
No one who █████ ██ █ █████ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ ██ █████████ █████████ ███ █████ ██████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███
c
My neighbors have ███ ████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ██████ █████ ██████ ███ █████ ██ █ █████ ███ ████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ███ ██ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ███
d
My next-door neighbors ██ ███ ███ █████ ██████ █████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██ █ █████ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██ █████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ██████
e
Anyone who lives ██ █ █████ ███ ████ ███ ███ ██ ████ ████ ██ ███ ██ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██████ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ███