Cartographer: Maps are like language: they can be manipulated in order to mislead. ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββββββ
The cartographer concludes that we shouldnβt think people arenβt misled by maps, even though theyβre rarely misled by words. People are taught to be cautious about language, but thereβs virtually no education about maps.
The referenced text supports the conclusion. Itβs part of a distinction that shows why the fact that people are not generally misled by language doesn't necessarily imply that people are not generally misled by maps.
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββββ
It is offered ββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ
The cartographer is arguing that a certain conclusion canβt be drawn from the analogy between maps and language. The referenced text doesnβt clarify the meaning of the argumentβs conclusionβit helps spell out why maps and language are dissimilar cases.
It is a ββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββββββ
The referenced text isnβt a conclusion. Thereβs no support for the claim that people are taught to be cautious interpreters of language.
It is part ββ β βββββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ
The referenced text distinguishes how people are educated in language from how people are educated in maps. In turn, this distinction supports the conclusion that we shouldnβt assume people wonβt be misled by maps simply because theyβre not misled by language.
It is offered ββ βββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ
Although the author points out that both maps and language can be manipulated to mislead, the referenced text isn't offered as support for that similarity. Rather, it points out a difference between maps and language.
It is the ββββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
The referenced text isnβt a conclusion. Thereβs no support for the claim that people are taught to be cautious interpreters of language.