Cartographer: Maps are like language: they can be manipulated in order to mislead. ████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ █████████ ██████ ██ ██████ ████████ ██████ ███ ████ ██ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ████████ ████████████ ██ █████████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ █████████████ ███ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ████████████
The cartographer concludes that we shouldn’t think people aren’t misled by maps, even though they’re rarely misled by words. People are taught to be cautious about language, but there’s virtually no education about maps.
The referenced text supports the conclusion. It’s part of a distinction that shows why the fact that people are not generally misled by language doesn't necessarily imply that people are not generally misled by maps.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███ █████████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██ ████████ ████████████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████████ █████████
It is offered ██ ██ ██████████ ████ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████████
The cartographer is arguing that a certain conclusion can’t be drawn from the analogy between maps and language. The referenced text doesn’t clarify the meaning of the argument’s conclusion—it helps spell out why maps and language are dissimilar cases.
It is a ██████████ █████ ████ ███ █████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████████ ███ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ████████████
The referenced text isn’t a conclusion. There’s no support for the claim that people are taught to be cautious interpreters of language.
It is part ██ █ ███████████ █████ ██ █████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███████████
The referenced text distinguishes how people are educated in language from how people are educated in maps. In turn, this distinction supports the conclusion that we shouldn’t assume people won’t be misled by maps simply because they’re not misled by language.
It is offered ██ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ████████████ ██ █████████
Although the author points out that both maps and language can be manipulated to mislead, the referenced text isn't offered as support for that similarity. Rather, it points out a difference between maps and language.
It is the ██████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████
The referenced text isn’t a conclusion. There’s no support for the claim that people are taught to be cautious interpreters of language.