It has been argued that the immense size of . █████████████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ██ ██ ████ ████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ████ █ ██████████ ███ █ ███████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ ████ ██ █████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ████████ ██ ██ ██████ █████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ████ █████ ████████ ████ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ████
The author concludes that the theory that Tyrannosaurus rex was exclusively a scavenger is an overly hasty inference. As support for this conclusion, the author addresses a possibility that those who believe that T. rex was a scavenger fail to consider: that the prey of T. rex could be even larger than T. rex. If this was the case, then the prey would probably have been slower than T. rex. This possibility weakens the theory that T. rex was primarily a scavenger.
The claim in the question stem is the inference that the author concludes was made too hastily.
The claim that T. rex █████ ████ ████ ████ █ ██████████ ███ █ ███████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████████
It is a ██████████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ██ █████████ ████████████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████
The conclusion advanced by the argument is just that the theory that T. rex was exclusively a scavenger is a hasty inference. There is no logical inconsistency here; the author is just asserting that the given evidence is not enough.
It is a ██████████ ████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ██████
The author does not claim that the hypothesis in the question stem is probably false––this language is too strong. The author only claims that this hypothesis was “overly hasty,” meaning that we cannot make this conclusion from the information given.
It is a ██████████ ████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ █████████
In asserting that the claim in the question stem is “overly hasty,” the author is saying that this claim doesn’t have enough support, not that it’s false. This is why (C) is correct––the author claims that the evidence is not sufficient to claim that T. rex was a scavenger.
It is offered ██ ████████ ██ ███████ ██ █ ██████████ ████ ███ ████████ █████████ ██ ██ ██████
The claim in the question stem is the hypothesis that the author is discussing; it is not offered as evidence of a hypothesis.
It is offered ██ ████████ ████ ██ █████████ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████
The statement in the question stem is the hypothesis that the author claims was an overly hasty inference; it is not offered as evidence.