Common sense suggests that we know our own thoughts directly, but that we infer the thoughts of other people. βββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ
Standard assumption Β·We know our own thoughts directly
Elaborate on analogy Β·Expertise makes us think we see relationships directly, when we're really just making very quick inferences
Example: chess experts' ability to "see" whether a position is weak or strong. Experts make inferences so fast they don't notice they're making them. And we are experts in our own thinking, so we don't notice our own inferences.
Mistaken implication of psychologists' perspective Β·Might seem that psychologists are saying we infer our own thoughts based on observations of our own behavior
The phrase "perilously close" indicates the author thinks that it would be dangerous for someone to think we infer thoughts based on our own behavior.
Clarification Β·Psychologists say we infer thoughts based on internal feelings and emotions
So, we're not making inferences based on seeing our own external behavior.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)
Single position
12.
According to the passage, one's βββββββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ β βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ
Question Type
Stated
In P2, the author tells us what greater expertise results in: βGreater expertise appears to change not only our knowledge of the area as a whole, but our very perception of entities in that area. It appears to us that we become able to see and to grasp these entities and their relations directly, whereas before we could only make inferences about them.β
a
an altered way ββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ
Not described as a result of greater expertise. Ways of expressing judgments have no connection to the discussion of expertise in P2.
6%
b
a more detail-oriented ββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ
Not described as a result of greater expertise. βDetail-orientedβ has no connection to the discussion of expertise in P2.
Not described as a result of greater expertise. The author doesnβt suggest expertise causes people to ignore errors. Errors arenβt discussed in connection with expertise in P2.
28%
d
a substantively different βββ ββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ
Stated. βSubstantivelyβ in this context means something like βimportantβ or βmeaningful.β Greater expertise results in what appears to be a different way of understanding how things relate in the field. We think we see relations directly, rather than indirectly. This difference is substantive β itβs an actual, meaningful difference.
Passages that focus on describing or evaluating potential explanations for a given phenomenon. Causal reasoning features prominently in these passages.