Babson: Conclusion The idea of charging people a dollar to read individual articles and essays online, while novel, will succeed if the quality of the articles and essays is high enough. β ββββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββ β βββββββ
βββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ β βββ ββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββ
Babson claims that charging people a dollar to read high-quality online articles will probably succeed, even though itβs a new idea. So why would it succeed? Because a dollar isnβt too much to charge, which is further supported by the fact that people will tip more than a dollar for various other services.
Cortez thinks that current tipping practices, which donβt yet include paying for individual articles, are actually a sign that this idea may fail. This is because people generally only tip when thereβs a custom of tipping for a particular service. This means that they may not tip for a new type of service.
Weβre looking for a point of disagreement. Babson and Cortez disagree about whether current tipping culture predicts the success of this idea for charging for online articles.
The dialogue provides the most βββββββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ
people will routinely ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββ ββ
people in countries ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββ β ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ
it is possible ββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββ βββ β ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ β ββββββββ
people's attitudes toward βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ β ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ
most people are ββββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββ β ββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββ β βββββ βββ