PT105.S1.Q12

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

Mismatched conclusion. The strength of the conclusion of (A) does not match the strength of the conclusion of the stimulus. The stimulus concludes that something certainly will not happen; the conclusion of (A) says that something is likely.

Mismatched premises. The stimulus gives a sufficient condition with two independent necessary conditions, then negates one of those necessary conditions. (B) gives a sufficient condition (Leon going) with one necessary condition (Vera going), then negates the sufficient condition (/Leon going).

Mismatched premises and conclusion. The stimulus gives a sufficient condition with two independent necessary conditions. (D) gives a sufficient condition (Paula working with Elise) with one necessary condition (Jane working with Arthur).

The stimulus makes a straightforward conclusion that Alice will not volunteer; (D) makes a conditional conclusion (/Paula→ Arthur with Jane and Elise)

Mismatched conclusion. Unlike the stimulus, (E) makes a conditional conclusion (/rain→work).