Archaeologist: A large corporation has recently offered to provide funding to restore an archaeological site and to construct facilities to make the site readily accessible to the general public. ███ ███████████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ████████ █████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████████ ████ ████████ ███ ████ █████ ██████ ██ █████████ ████████ ███████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ██████████ █████████
The archaeologist concludes that the corporation should not restore and open the site. His reasoning is that parts of the site have not yet been examined.
Why does a site being partially unexamined (the support) make it off-limits for reconstruction and public access (the conclusion)? The archaeologist needs to add an assumption that bridges the gap here. For example: if a site has not been fully examined, it should not be reconstructed or opened to the public.
Which one of the following ███████████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███ ███████████████ █████████
The ownership of ██████████████ █████ ██████ ███ ██ █████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████ ██████████
Any restoration of ██ ██████████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ ███ ████ ███████ ██████ ██ ████ ██████ ████████
No one should ████ █████████ █████ ████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ █████████████
Only those with █ ████ ███████ ███ ██ ██████████████ ██████ ███████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ █████
The risk of ██████ ████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ██████ ████████ ██████ ████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████ ██████████